Your needs
Reporting to our funders with evidence
“Our financial partners want located, dated results. We produce narrative reports.”
What is happening
Your situation
Your programme delivers real results. But your monitoring system rests on declarative returns, disconnected spreadsheets and reports written after the fact. At every supervision mission, the same difficulty: demonstrating that what is declared exists, where, and since when.
What you risk
- It is the opacity of declarative reporting that triggers audit reservations, not under-performance itself.
- Without a geolocated database, the final programme evaluation can neither establish attribution of effects nor compare before and after.
- Every poorly prepared supervision mission consumes weeks of team time and delays disbursement of the next tranche.
Our answer
What we do
We install a geospatial monitoring and evaluation system: mobile field collection by equipped enumerators, every entry time-stamped and located, a consolidated database, continuous spatial verification by imagery, and reporting in a dashboard your management consults without an intermediary. The supervision report becomes an extraction, not a drafting exercise.
In the Central African context
What you receive
Deliverables
Things delivered, not intentions.
- Geolocated monitoring and evaluation databases
- Periodic monitoring reports with dated photographic evidence
- Programme impact maps
- Interactive web dashboards and geolocated performance indicators
- End-of-programme impact and territorial dynamics evaluation
Services involved
ODT structures and operates territorial programmes. XP-NOVA delivers the engineering.
Recommended first step: A geolocated collection system deployed on one component, to demonstrate before scaling up.
Let's talk about your territory
Describe your territory and your ambition: a first response within 48 working hours.