XP-NOVA

Your needs

Making our municipal development plan fundable

“We have a development plan. It is dormant, because none of its projects is fundable as it stands.”

The four movements of the page: the situation, what you risk, our answer, what you receive.01The situationworded as it is put to us02What you risk4 risks identified03Our answer5 services mobilised04What you receive5 deliverables
Reading map for this page. The counters are those of this situation, not generic values.

What is happening

Your situation

Your municipality or region has a development plan — often drawn up under an earlier programme, sometimes an old one. It lists legitimate intentions. But none is sized, none is costed defensibly, none is prioritised against an explicit criterion. The result: when a financial partner asks “which project, for what amount, with what social return”, you have no answer to give.

What you risk

  • A development plan that has not been operationalised is not a plan: it is a list. No funding window finances a list.
  • Local authorities without a portfolio of ready projects are systematically served after those that have one — funding goes to what has been appraised, not to what is needed.
  • Without explicit prioritisation, every change of executive reshuffles the deck and the territory starts again from zero.
  • The Global Infrastructure Hub reference framework establishes that preparing a project accounts for 5 to 12% of its total cost in an emerging economy. Under-investing at this stage is the leading cause of stalling.

Our answer

What we do

We turn the plan into a portfolio. Socio-economic territorial assessment and GIS mapping of the municipality, multi-year investment programming with written and contestable prioritisation criteria, then technical and financial sizing of the three to five most mature projects up to a file that can be put to a funding window. The plan stops being a document and becomes a queue of appraised projects.

In the Central African context

We systematically align programming with national frameworks — the national development strategy and existing municipal plans. A portfolio that cannot be connected to a national framework finds no budget door, whatever its technical quality.

The decisive lever

A local authority rarely pays for this work itself. Funding comes from a national programme, a development partner or a decentralisation fund. Our first piece of work with you is therefore not to sell you a study: it is to profile your territory from the public data in our Observatory, free of charge, and to identify together the window that can fund it.

What you receive

Deliverables

Things delivered, not intentions.

  • Socio-economic territorial assessment and GIS mapping
  • Prioritised multi-year investment programme, with criteria set out
  • Rural development master plan or updated municipal plan
  • Three to five project files, sized and costed in FCFA
  • Matrix of funding windows available for each project

Sources

  • Chapter 3 — Financing Project Preparation, Global Infrastructure Hubedition date not shown on the chapter consulted

Recommended first step: A free profile of your territory, from the public data in our Observatory.

Assess your situation

Your answers travel with your enquiry: the engineer who calls you back will already know your case.

1 · Your situation

You are…
Where do things stand?
The funding for this operation…
By when do you need to have moved forward?

2 · So we can reply

Reply from an engineer within 48 working hours.

No commercial terms are published on this site: terms are set out in a proposal, after qualification.

Let's talk about your territory

Describe your territory and your ambition: a first response within 48 working hours.